![]() | ||||
|
| ||||
|
|
||||
Recent Articles
|
« Older: Snow, sleet, freezing rain cancel school; more snow and ice on the way Newer: APSU hosts ‘V-Day: Until the Violence Stops’ »
Anti-gay adoption bill filed in Tennessee2/4/2009 — Editor’s note: This is not the bill filed January 29, 2009. For details about that bill, please click here. This article was written in response to a similar bill filed in January of 2008. Discriminatory legislation should be rejected
The companion bills are SB3910 and HB3713. It is more than a little disturbing to realize that people believe–even in today’s world– that gay and lesbian people can not be (or already are) great parents. I think it goes deeper than that. Gay and lesbian people have consistently been the great whipping boys (and girls) of conservative neocons who appeal to a deep hatred for the gay community to help boost their own popularity. Sadly, this kind of contempt goes far beyond mere religious views. Clarksville’s own representative, Rep. Joe Pitts, stands in stark contrast to Deberry and Stanley. Pitts has sponsored or co-sponsored several bills that directly affect a real threat to our children– child sexual offenders– which I applaud. These predators should be identified, deterred, and imprisoned at all cost. These vile predators are the real threats to our children, not loving, committed gay and lesbian people who want to provide safe homes for children. Gays and lesbians aren’t the only people affected by this proposed bill. It states:
That’s right. Unless a couple is actually married, they would be prohibited from adopting. The bill does not affect singles who adopt. This isn’t the first time such a bill has been proposed. Three years ago, a similar bill was introduced and died in legislation. One important fact we need to remember is that every single major medical and psychological organization in the country recognizes that homosexuality is neither a disease to be cured nor a disorder to be treated. The American Psychological Association has a policy statement on gay parenting which opposes any discrimination based on sexual orientation in matters of adoption, child custody and visitation, foster care, and reproductive health services. In an article dated Februrary 13, 2005, I wrote:
The reality is that our current system works. Children aren’t arbitrarily tossed into homes. In fact, judges currently have complete oversight as to who gets to adopt whom. Our judges are given the opportunity to weigh every single family situation, and they are given stacks of report from the Department of Children’s Services (DCS) on the viability of the adoptive parents’ homes. Homes are studied and the would-be-parents are carefully screened and given psychological evaluation as to whether or not they’re fit to be parents. All of this has one thing at heart: the best interest of our children. Quite simply, a person’s sexual orientation is not a major consideration. DCS workers have far more important questions: Is the home safe? Is the couple (or individual) sound? Is there a history in their past that might jeopardize the safety of the children? And finally, what’s best for the child? Apparently, there are those who believe that these highly qualified and skilled people should be denied the opportunity to consider thousands of committed, loving couples based solely on the nature of their relationship. It is simply not right, just, or even fair, that a vocal group of people who know little about the adoption process should think they’re better qualified to decide who gets to adopt. Their only consideration is that, as the Arkansas Supreme Court said in a ruling against a ban on gay adoption, they are biased against homosexuals. In many cases, gay and lesbian couples are the ONLY people who’ll adopt older children, or children who have disabilities. Should these kids who’ve been rejected at every opportunity be denied their best, sometimes last, hope at finding a loving and stable home? Rep. Deberry and Senator Stanley seem to think so. They are wrong. My partner and I will seek to adopt in the (hopefully) not-too-distant future. The reason we haven’t already is that we both know we’re not in a financial place where we can support a family. That will change in the future. Several friends of mine, including my own spiritual mentor, are in same-sex relationships and have either adopted successfully or are in the process of adopting. These are teachers, deputies, florists, and shop owners who all have one thing in common: they absolutely love children, and have devoted their lives to their kids. They’re great parents, and this fact is supported by the judges and DCS social workers who have closely evaluated their homes and lives. I urge anyone to call their state representative and state senator to add their voices to those who oppose this hateful bill. It is unfair, it is discriminatory, and as I said before, it is just flat-out wrong. It has no place in our laws, nor in our great state. About David W. Shelton
|
Archives
|
||
© 2009 Clarksville, TN Online is owned and operated by residents of Clarksville Tennessee.
| ||||
January 31st, 2008 at 2:39 pm
I am forever amazed at the hoops adoptive parents jump through (more so for non-traditional families, it seems)in their quest to give an otherwise unwanted child a loving home. Adoption is a conscious, carefully thought out choice; not simple, not easy. It is a life commitment, not made lightly or rooted in impulse. A decision to adopt is a decision that is all about love.
Adoptive parents are closely scrutinized on everything from income to abilities before they can be granted the blessing of a child in their home. How many natural (non-adoptive) parents could pass the same muster?
To deny a child the potential of family (regardless of the form of that family) is unconscionable. Legislating the structure of family based on race, marital status, creed, or sexual orientation (or anything else) is outright discrimination.
We cannot legislate love or family.
February 1st, 2008 at 8:43 am
Good article David. Thought you may interested that I wrote a letter to my state elected officials asking them to not support the bills. here is the letter.
Sen. Kurita and Rep. Johnson,
I would like to ask you to not support SB3910 and HB3713 introduced by Sen. DeBerry and Rep. Stanley respectively. These bills deny gay couples the right to adopt a child. A persons sexual orientation alone should not be a factor (much less THE determining factor) when trying to find a parentless child an alternative to an lonely orphange.
Has anyone asked the children about this? Would they prefer a institutional orphange over a loving gay couple? Kids that are up for adoption already have one strike against them in life. They deserve that all Tennesseans give them all the chances available to get them out of the system and into a supportive home.
As always (though hardly ever recieved), I would appreciate hearing your position on this issue. Thank you for your service to our great state.
February 1st, 2008 at 1:33 pm
Two Tennessee legislators, Rep. John Deberry (D-Memphis) and Senator Paul Stanley (R-Memphis) filed bills to prohibit unmarried, cohabitating individuals from adopting children.
February 4th, 2008 at 2:40 pm
[...] seems as though the same anti-queer frenzy on gay adoption has spread to neighboring Tennessee. On Jan. 30, a Tennessee State House member and State Senate member introduced two companion bills [...]
May 10th, 2008 at 1:30 pm
Poisonous Parenting: Confused, Pt. 1…
I fell down a bit of a rabbit hole yesterday. During a (rare) quiet moment, I took some time to catch up on my news/blog reading. And I finally started reading a collection of news stories that I’d quietly tucked away until I could actually bring myse…