<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Watershed signs: more government waste?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clarksvilleonline.com/2008/03/24/watershed-signs-are-more-government-waste/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clarksvilleonline.com/2008/03/24/watershed-signs-are-more-government-waste/</link>
	<description>The voice of Clarksville, Tennessee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:42:47 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Intro to TN Watersheds &#171; this gd life.</title>
		<link>http://www.clarksvilleonline.com/2008/03/24/watershed-signs-are-more-government-waste/comment-page-1/#comment-6987</link>
		<dc:creator>Intro to TN Watersheds &#171; this gd life.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 17:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clarksvilleonline.com/2008/03/24/watershed-signs-are-more-government-waste/#comment-6987</guid>
		<description>[...] besides the fact that this is a $300,000 project (and yes, we paid for it), this is just about the strangest illustration of water and (maybe) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] besides the fact that this is a $300,000 project (and yes, we paid for it), this is just about the strangest illustration of water and (maybe) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Beasley</title>
		<link>http://www.clarksvilleonline.com/2008/03/24/watershed-signs-are-more-government-waste/comment-page-1/#comment-6449</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Beasley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Mar 2008 01:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clarksvilleonline.com/2008/03/24/watershed-signs-are-more-government-waste/#comment-6449</guid>
		<description>Admittedly, Christine, I had no idea what a &quot;watershed&quot; was until these signs were posted, as did many of my co-workers.  That being said, I DID know that water seeks out its lowest point, and anytime one litters, its bound to end up in our streams, lakes or rivers, or contaminating our planet in some fashion.  Its basically common sense, which again, admittedly, many Americans lack.  The war in Iraq has undoubtedly cost us more than any state project we have undertaken, and though many disagree with the Iraq war, I do see a just cause there.  I understand many do not agree with me and the argument can be made that Iraq never was a threat to us, but the argument can also be made that Germany wasn&#039;t viable threat in 1937 either, but had we invaded then, think of how many lives would have been saved.  I know the prognostication aspect is a moot point, for we will never truly know, but Iraq had had 12 years, since THEY invaded a soverign nation, to comply with the sanctions from the UN.  They didn&#039;t hold up on their end of the deal.  Enough about Iraq, no matter what you or I say, we aren&#039;t withdrawing anytime soon!  What we can do is speak out against government waste anytime we see it.  The concept of spend it this year, so we get it next year, needs to cease in our state government.  This is why the funds were allocated for this &quot;common sense&quot; promotion.  This really has NOTHING to do with the environment.  To think these signs will constitute a decrease in littering or promote awareness of watersheds is an exercise in futility.  Why would one need to be informed of this driving down the road?  I know how you feel, Christine, the environment needs all the help it can get, and I&#039;m right there with you, but at some point, we&#039;ve got to realize that $10 TRILLION dollars in debt is an inculcation into future slavery to our debtors, and we&#039;ve got to start somewhere.  I feel very comfortable addressing the City, County and State levels and demanding responsibility.  I know people at all three levels very well, but before I go attacking the Federal government and the &quot;Republican propaganda machine&quot;, along with the Democrats, I feel we have to start small and build our way up. I think if promoting &quot;awareness&quot; of watersheds was the goal, my letter would have played right into their hands, but I feel, from past experience and demonstrated performance, it just more government waste, and &quot;spend it now, so we get it next year&quot; mentality.  Our mother earth is very resilient, regardless of what the pathetic humans can muster, it will overcome.  It has endure much more drastic changes that we could ever hope to subject it to.  I find it ironic, that I, being quite skeptical of man made global warming, seem to be looked upon as a &quot;fool&quot; if I don&#039;t subscribe to the idea that Manhattan will be submerged by 2050.  We will adapt or we will perish, the earth will change, regardless of what we do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Admittedly, Christine, I had no idea what a &#8220;watershed&#8221; was until these signs were posted, as did many of my co-workers.  That being said, I DID know that water seeks out its lowest point, and anytime one litters, its bound to end up in our streams, lakes or rivers, or contaminating our planet in some fashion.  Its basically common sense, which again, admittedly, many Americans lack.  The war in Iraq has undoubtedly cost us more than any state project we have undertaken, and though many disagree with the Iraq war, I do see a just cause there.  I understand many do not agree with me and the argument can be made that Iraq never was a threat to us, but the argument can also be made that Germany wasn&#8217;t viable threat in 1937 either, but had we invaded then, think of how many lives would have been saved.  I know the prognostication aspect is a moot point, for we will never truly know, but Iraq had had 12 years, since THEY invaded a soverign nation, to comply with the sanctions from the UN.  They didn&#8217;t hold up on their end of the deal.  Enough about Iraq, no matter what you or I say, we aren&#8217;t withdrawing anytime soon!  What we can do is speak out against government waste anytime we see it.  The concept of spend it this year, so we get it next year, needs to cease in our state government.  This is why the funds were allocated for this &#8220;common sense&#8221; promotion.  This really has NOTHING to do with the environment.  To think these signs will constitute a decrease in littering or promote awareness of watersheds is an exercise in futility.  Why would one need to be informed of this driving down the road?  I know how you feel, Christine, the environment needs all the help it can get, and I&#8217;m right there with you, but at some point, we&#8217;ve got to realize that $10 TRILLION dollars in debt is an inculcation into future slavery to our debtors, and we&#8217;ve got to start somewhere.  I feel very comfortable addressing the City, County and State levels and demanding responsibility.  I know people at all three levels very well, but before I go attacking the Federal government and the &#8220;Republican propaganda machine&#8221;, along with the Democrats, I feel we have to start small and build our way up. I think if promoting &#8220;awareness&#8221; of watersheds was the goal, my letter would have played right into their hands, but I feel, from past experience and demonstrated performance, it just more government waste, and &#8220;spend it now, so we get it next year&#8221; mentality.  Our mother earth is very resilient, regardless of what the pathetic humans can muster, it will overcome.  It has endure much more drastic changes that we could ever hope to subject it to.  I find it ironic, that I, being quite skeptical of man made global warming, seem to be looked upon as a &#8220;fool&#8221; if I don&#8217;t subscribe to the idea that Manhattan will be submerged by 2050.  We will adapt or we will perish, the earth will change, regardless of what we do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christine Anne Piesyk</title>
		<link>http://www.clarksvilleonline.com/2008/03/24/watershed-signs-are-more-government-waste/comment-page-1/#comment-6444</link>
		<dc:creator>Christine Anne Piesyk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 02:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clarksvilleonline.com/2008/03/24/watershed-signs-are-more-government-waste/#comment-6444</guid>
		<description>I am all for a halt on government waste, but on the issue of watersheds and signage for such areas, I am less concerned than Mr. Beasley. I like to know that areas such as the ones where I have canoed, fished, had picnics, or simply admired, areas that may be the source of our water supply, are part of a protected and valued area. 
Such signs are small reminders of big issues. 

When I look at government waste, my eyes stop first at military spending: I instantly shift my balance sheet to what a trillion of those Iraq war dollar could do for this country and for our own people, our mothers, fathers, children and grandchildren: education from pre-K to college, affordable housing, universal health care ... my laundry list is extensive. 

I remain deeply concerned about the environment, and believe it or not, over my years in news coverage I have learned that too many people have no clue what or where a watershed is, nor do they understand the importance of an aquifer, or what the impact everyday use and abuse of such areas can mean for the long haul. Our earth is fragile, and if a watershed sign proves to be reminder or makes someone ask the question &quot;why is that important?&quot; -- it be worth it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am all for a halt on government waste, but on the issue of watersheds and signage for such areas, I am less concerned than Mr. Beasley. I like to know that areas such as the ones where I have canoed, fished, had picnics, or simply admired, areas that may be the source of our water supply, are part of a protected and valued area.<br />
Such signs are small reminders of big issues. </p>
<p>When I look at government waste, my eyes stop first at military spending: I instantly shift my balance sheet to what a trillion of those Iraq war dollar could do for this country and for our own people, our mothers, fathers, children and grandchildren: education from pre-K to college, affordable housing, universal health care &#8230; my laundry list is extensive. </p>
<p>I remain deeply concerned about the environment, and believe it or not, over my years in news coverage I have learned that too many people have no clue what or where a watershed is, nor do they understand the importance of an aquifer, or what the impact everyday use and abuse of such areas can mean for the long haul. Our earth is fragile, and if a watershed sign proves to be reminder or makes someone ask the question &#8220;why is that important?&#8221; &#8212; it be worth it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
