<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CTS fares &#8220;adjusted&#8221;: Elimination of transfers could double cost for many riders</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clarksvilleonline.com/2008/07/30/cts-fares-adjusted-elimination-of-transfers-could-double-cost-for-many-riders/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clarksvilleonline.com/2008/07/30/cts-fares-adjusted-elimination-of-transfers-could-double-cost-for-many-riders/</link>
	<description>The voice of Clarksville, Tennessee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:42:47 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Turner McCullough Jr.</title>
		<link>http://www.clarksvilleonline.com/2008/07/30/cts-fares-adjusted-elimination-of-transfers-could-double-cost-for-many-riders/comment-page-1/#comment-9739</link>
		<dc:creator>Turner McCullough Jr.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:05:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clarksvilleonline.com/?p=6646#comment-9739</guid>
		<description>The elimination of transfers is unheralded. Nowhere else in the nation are public transportation eliminating bus transfers. Increases to the transfer rate, yes, but not the outright elimination. This just doesn&#039;t make sense. The very segment of the public that most utilizes CTS can ill-afford this doubling of their transportation costs. 

Mass transit is known to be a non-self-supporting exercise of local government operations nation-wide. CTS is to be commended for keepings its expenses wihtin an acceptable range, however, now it is imperative to look at service options that best serve the traveling public and offer good ridership potentials. The Oak Grove Wal-Mart run should not be dropped. Combine it with the newly expanded service to the Great Escape Complex and ridership should prove quite rewarding. That NE corridor has needed improved bus service for many years. 

Using smaller buses other than peak hour opertaion is a sane idea and should be investigated.Electric buses are certainly something CTS can pursue thru its FTA/FHA funding schedule.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The elimination of transfers is unheralded. Nowhere else in the nation are public transportation eliminating bus transfers. Increases to the transfer rate, yes, but not the outright elimination. This just doesn&#8217;t make sense. The very segment of the public that most utilizes CTS can ill-afford this doubling of their transportation costs. </p>
<p>Mass transit is known to be a non-self-supporting exercise of local government operations nation-wide. CTS is to be commended for keepings its expenses wihtin an acceptable range, however, now it is imperative to look at service options that best serve the traveling public and offer good ridership potentials. The Oak Grove Wal-Mart run should not be dropped. Combine it with the newly expanded service to the Great Escape Complex and ridership should prove quite rewarding. That NE corridor has needed improved bus service for many years. </p>
<p>Using smaller buses other than peak hour opertaion is a sane idea and should be investigated.Electric buses are certainly something CTS can pursue thru its FTA/FHA funding schedule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
