<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tennessee State Senate District 22: &#8220;In case of emergency, unleash Fletch!&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clarksvilleonline.com/2008/08/06/tennessee-state-senate-district-22-in-case-of-emergency-release-fletch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clarksvilleonline.com/2008/08/06/tennessee-state-senate-district-22-in-case-of-emergency-release-fletch/</link>
	<description>The voice of Clarksville, Tennessee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 19:52:43 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: votechange</title>
		<link>http://www.clarksvilleonline.com/2008/08/06/tennessee-state-senate-district-22-in-case-of-emergency-release-fletch/comment-page-1/#comment-9833</link>
		<dc:creator>votechange</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 04:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clarksvilleonline.com/?p=7018#comment-9833</guid>
		<description>So...let me get this straight. 

Kurita voted AGAINST the legislative bill to help seniors...
But she&#039;s telling everybody that she really voted FOR it,??? Is she confused? I mean really. 

&quot;How we treat our seniors says a lot about our priorities.&quot;  (Quote from Kurita in her TV ad) 

Yes, ma&#039;am! It sure does!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So&#8230;let me get this straight. </p>
<p>Kurita voted AGAINST the legislative bill to help seniors&#8230;<br />
But she&#8217;s telling everybody that she really voted FOR it,??? Is she confused? I mean really. </p>
<p>&#8220;How we treat our seniors says a lot about our priorities.&#8221;  (Quote from Kurita in her TV ad) </p>
<p>Yes, ma&#8217;am! It sure does!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pressed Or Simply Cautious? : Post Politics: Political News and Views in Tennessee</title>
		<link>http://www.clarksvilleonline.com/2008/08/06/tennessee-state-senate-district-22-in-case-of-emergency-release-fletch/comment-page-1/#comment-9820</link>
		<dc:creator>Pressed Or Simply Cautious? : Post Politics: Political News and Views in Tennessee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 17:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clarksvilleonline.com/?p=7018#comment-9820</guid>
		<description>[...] Turner McCullough editorializes on the recent negative campaigning by Senator Rosalind Kurita against her primary opponent Tim Barnes: Financial reporting records show Kurita had a substantial war chest with which to wage her re-election bid. The good senator is reported to have retained the services of Fletcher and Rowley, the renown Nashville public relations firm, known for negative advertising. Nashville media political pundits have speculated whether she was feeling stressed enough to releash the hounds at Flecther as the campaign draws to an end. Judging by the caliber of her recent campaign mailings, it would seem that she has decided time has come to get down and dirty with this campaign. How else would you explain mailings criticizing an attorney for providing constitutionally guaranteed legal counsel to those who need it? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Turner McCullough editorializes on the recent negative campaigning by Senator Rosalind Kurita against her primary opponent Tim Barnes: Financial reporting records show Kurita had a substantial war chest with which to wage her re-election bid. The good senator is reported to have retained the services of Fletcher and Rowley, the renown Nashville public relations firm, known for negative advertising. Nashville media political pundits have speculated whether she was feeling stressed enough to releash the hounds at Flecther as the campaign draws to an end. Judging by the caliber of her recent campaign mailings, it would seem that she has decided time has come to get down and dirty with this campaign. How else would you explain mailings criticizing an attorney for providing constitutionally guaranteed legal counsel to those who need it? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
