Clarksville, TN Online: News, Opinion, Arts & Entertainment.

A Winter Weather Advisory for Montgomery County Tennessee is in effect...
[Click here for more information]

Obama birth certificate lawsuit tossed out of court

 

The highly publicized lawsuit filed by Philip Berg against Democratic Presidential nominee Barack Obama and the Democratic party itself has been thrown out of court. Berg filed the lawsuit in August of this year, claiming that Obama’s birth certificate is a fraud and that Obama’s name should be removed from the ballot.

Conservative pundits have hailed the lawsuit in the past, with even popular radio show host Rush Limbaugh having opined on how Obama’s visit to his dying grandmother is related to the now-defunct lawsuit. More commonly asked is “why doesn’t Obama just show his original birth certificate? Then this will all go away.”

It will all go away? Really? If anyone really believes that, then I’ll sell you a bridge in Brooklyn for a thousand dollars. It’s cheap. At least it makes for good entertainment.

The Phildelphia Daily News reported on the dismissal today:

U.S. District Judge R. Barclay Surrick had denied Berg’s request for a temporary restraining order on Aug. 22 but had not ruled on the merits of the suit until yesterday. Obama and the Democratic National Committee had asked Surrick to dismiss Berg’s complaint in a court filing on Sept. 24.

They said that Berg’s claims were “ridiculous” and “patently false,” that Berg had “no standing” to challenge the qualifications of a candidate for president because he had not shown the requisite harm to himself.

Surrick agreed.

In a 34-page memorandum and opinion, the judge said Berg’s allegations of harm were “too vague and too attenuated” to confer standing on him or any other voters. Surrick ruled that Berg’s attempts to use certain laws to gain standing to pursue his claim that Obama was not a natural-born citizen were “frivolous and not worthy of discussion.”

When the judge writes that a lawsuit is “frivolous and not worthy of discussion,” I think it’s time to move on. But, of course, they won’t.

My favorite claim by conservative bloggers and pundits was that the birth certificate was “photoshopped.” Well, I am happy to say that while I might not be an expert on very many things in this world, Adobe Photoshop happens to be one of them. I’ve even got the credentials to prove it. And I’ll put myself on the line by saying, “horse hockey.” The certificate number on the certificate shown on Obama’s website was redacted. That’s it.

The most popular claim is that the image is not quite perfect, and has some signs of a “halo” around some of the copy. “But there are artifacts shown around the letters. That proves it was Photoshopped!” No. It proves that it was saved as a JPEG format, which is a lossy compression — that creates artifacts around sharp edges (like around type) when saved in a medium-to-low quality compression.

Look, I don’t care if you think the scan of Obama’s birth certificate was edited, but for crying out loud, don’t try to kid me with the notion that you know what a photoshopped image looks like. You’ll only embarrass yourself. If that particular document was edited on June 12th, then great. It’s called “crop.” A standard feature in Photoshop. Nice try.

Now, if this image from Obama’s website was the only image on the Web, I’d be concerned. As luck would have it, it’s not. Newsweek’s website posted photos that were taken for the factcheck.org site, which presents the document in various angles, and show the embossed seal (which is required on all official documents). Oh, by the way — they’re not “photoshopped” either.

Berg himself had been traveling the circuit, and declared to right-wingnut Michael Savage that Obama’s failing to file response to his ridiculous (as presiding Judge Surrick called it) was an admission of guilt. No, Mr. Berg. Your assertions were ludicrous, and the Obama lawyers knew it.

Berg has said he would appeal the decision, but really – when even the right-wing WorldNet Daily website has determined that the certificate is genuine, isn’t it time to move on? Apparently Berg and fellow nutjob Jerome Corsi don’t think so. Corsi is best known for his anti-Kerry attack book, Unfit for Command and the equally-discredited The Obama Nation: Leftist Politics and the Cult of Personality, which met with a stinging, 40-page rebuttal from Senator Obama’s website.

Conservatives should be extremely leery of Corsi and his extremist rants. He’s even brought his verbal cannons against King George himself, claiming that President Bush is working to create a “North American Union,” which would eventually eliminate the sovereignty of the United States.

President Bush intends to abrogate U.S. sovereignty to the North American Union, a new economic and political entity which the President is quietly forming, much as the European Union has formed.

Corsi is clearly not satisfied with blasting away at Democrats and liberals, so he goes after every single witch hunt imaginable. Not only are his conclusions highly questionable, his facts are often just dead wrong. I don’t think I’m going out on a stretch by saying “he’s a nut.” Apparently conservative writer John Hawkins said the same thing. Well, his word was “kooky.” If we add “creepy,” we’d have the first stanza of the Addams Family theme song. I’ll bring the snaps.

And this is one of the leading voices in the “Obama’s birth certificate is a fraud” nonsense. Maybe we’ll get a grip and realize just how silly all of this has been. The birth certificate/citizenship brouhaha has been little more than a mad-dash attempt to discredit Obama since they have little else to run on. Well, that and unlicensed plumbers.

The fact is that Obama’s birth certificate is genuine, and he is a natural-born citizen of the United States of America.

UPDATE: It seems that this particluar issue is getting sillier by the minute. Read more here.

Share this article:

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Slashdot
  • Fark
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Live
  • MySpace
  • Twitter

Sections

News, Opinion

Topics

, , , ,

7 Responses to “Obama birth certificate lawsuit tossed out of court”

  1. sDee Says:
    October 27th, 2008 at 2:33 pm

    You clearly do not understand the issue David. The federal judge’d ruling said a US citizen has does not have right to request or require Obama prove he meets the Constitutional requirements to be President. That alone ought to scare the H out of anyone.

    The Certification of Live Birth you point to unfortunately does not prove Citizenship. They are issued to anyone who requests one.

    Ask yourself this – if he has it, why didn’t Barrack Obama just provide proof of citizen and make a mockery of the federal case?

  2. FoxGoodman Says:
    October 27th, 2008 at 2:57 pm

    Any moron can see that what has been posted online is NOT a birth certificate. No Adobe credentials required. Laser printing, 11/01 date on the form, the paper it is printed on. Yes it does say it is a “Certificate of Live Birth” but it is NOT an original birth certificate – that does in fact exist but is not being displayed.

    The democratic Governor of Hawaii just yesterday (10/26)sealed the records for Obama and said that he needs to make the request to get it. http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=79174
    Very prudent given the circumstances.

    The only question is WHY Obama won’t post or share the real thing? What is on it that can be so damaging? Can it really be that bad? Does it say he is Caucasian? What is it?

    The inability or unwillingness to share this with the American public says that he will keep other things from the American public as well. This is the exact same thing that many people detest the Bush administration for. The difference is that the birth certificate should be harmless and would say I respect the American people.

    Obama should make it public now! Let’s get to the truth of the matter and get back to the election.

  3. Is this the real reason Obama heading to Hawaii? - Page 7 - U.S. Politics Online: A Political Discussion Forum Says:
    October 27th, 2008 at 3:13 pm

    [...] as a reason to come home when in reality it is to cover his ass. UPDATE: Lawsuit Tossed Out. Obama birth certificate lawsuit tossed out of court Clarksville, TN Online It was either Obama’s subversion or his team of wolf-lawyers…. Oh, Wait… The judge dismissed [...]

  4. RandomName Says:
    October 27th, 2008 at 3:24 pm

    Can you explain why the seal on factcheck.org of Obama’s birth cert is not legible? Seals have text on them, yeah?

    I would really like for you to tell me that the seal is authentic. Please review the hi res seal and get back to me as I would like to hear your opinion.

    (I am also a Photoshop instructor)

  5. Bill Larson Says:
    October 27th, 2008 at 8:48 pm

    Start here It will clarify the issue. On Hawaiian Birth Certificates the seal is located on the reverse side of the document. What you are seeing is a bleed through of the seal on the back of the document.

    “I guess the big issue that’s being raised is the lack of an embossed seal and a signature,” Okubo said, pointing out that in Hawaii, both those things are on the back of the document. “Because they scanned the front … you wouldn’t see those things.”

    Okubo says she got a copy of her own birth certificate last year and it is identical to the Obama one we received.

    And about the copy we e-mailed her for verification? “When we looked at that image you guys sent us, our registrar, he thought he could see pieces of the embossed image through it.”

    Read the rest of the article it’s very enlightening.

    As for the records being sealed that’s not quite accurate. Birth records in Hawaii are not public records as they are in most states.

    The ultimate document we sought was Obama’s birth certificate. Unlike the other documents, Hawaii birth certificates aren’t public record. Only family members can request copies, so when the campaign declined to give us one, we were stalled.

    The document was released after the politifact.com article that I reference was published. So basically sorry guys!

  6. David W. Shelton Says:
    October 27th, 2008 at 9:35 pm

    Ask yourself this – if he has it, why didn’t Barrack Obama just provide proof of citizen and make a mockery of the federal case?

    The federal case IS a mockery. Which is why it was thrown out of court. If it had any merit at all, wouldn’t Hillary Clinton or even John McCain have filed suit? After all, they’re the only ones who apparently have legal standing in this case.

    Judge Surrick said clearly at one point that the case would have had to have been filed in the District of Columbia. The FOIA claim was also rejected.

    The lack of standing is far from a technicality, and creates a very real problem for those who are apoplectic over the birth certificate: Does anyone seriously think that a man would have been able to run for office at both a state and federal level for years – without having their citizenship confirmed? He would have been booted out of even the Illinois state senate years ago if his citizenship was invalid.

    If you don’t like Obama, great. Don’t vote for him. Just spare us the hysteria of bogus issues.

    The seal has been verified by official sources to the Tampa Bay newspaper:

    http://www.tampabay.com/news/politics/article630058.ece

    There are also bloggers who have explained the Photoshop issue as well.

    http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/5626

  7. dlcomeau Says:
    October 28th, 2008 at 10:33 am

    The simple way to prove that Obama was born in Hawaii would be to question the doctor who delivered him. Why has this doctor not spoken up?

    Dennis

Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment.


Personal Controls

Archives

The Roxy Regional Theatre presents The Tale of Peter Rabbit