<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Senate compromise whittles down &#8220;Recovery&#8221; bill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clarksvilleonline.com/2009/02/08/senate-compromise-whittles-down-recovery-bill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clarksvilleonline.com/2009/02/08/senate-compromise-whittles-down-recovery-bill/</link>
	<description>The voice of Clarksville, Tennessee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:33:04 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bill Larson</title>
		<link>http://www.clarksvilleonline.com/2009/02/08/senate-compromise-whittles-down-recovery-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-10718</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Larson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 04:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clarksvilleonline.com/?p=15571#comment-10718</guid>
		<description>What specifically do you consider to be inaccurate in that article? 

The site has no leanings either way. But each author and contributor has their own views, and their writings may reflect that. If you wish to become a writer and express a contrasting view send Christine a sample of your writings. The only rules are attack the issue never the person, and that you have sources and references to back up statements made in your articles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What specifically do you consider to be inaccurate in that article? </p>
<p>The site has no leanings either way. But each author and contributor has their own views, and their writings may reflect that. If you wish to become a writer and express a contrasting view send Christine a sample of your writings. The only rules are attack the issue never the person, and that you have sources and references to back up statements made in your articles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RNurse</title>
		<link>http://www.clarksvilleonline.com/2009/02/08/senate-compromise-whittles-down-recovery-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-10717</link>
		<dc:creator>RNurse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 04:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clarksvilleonline.com/?p=15571#comment-10717</guid>
		<description>You source is Daily Kos? The article lost all credibility with that resource. Don&#039;t tell me Clarksville Online has gone liberal as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You source is Daily Kos? The article lost all credibility with that resource. Don&#8217;t tell me Clarksville Online has gone liberal as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
