![]() | ||||
|
| ||||
|
|
||||
Recent Articles
|
« Older: Obama proclaims June 2009 is Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Pride Month Newer: H.O.P.E. holds Woman’s Health Conference »
Goodbye, GMThis applies to Clarksville, TN because the Spring Hill, TN plant that assembles the Chevrolet Traverse will halt production in November laying off 2,447 employees. ![]() Michael Moore
As I sit here in GM’s birthplace, Flint, Michigan, I am surrounded by friends and family who are filled with anxiety about what will happen to them and to the town. Forty percent of the homes and businesses in the city have been abandoned. Imagine what it would be like if you lived in a city where almost every other house is empty. What would be your state of mind? It is with sad irony that the company which invented “planned obsolescence” — the decision to build cars that would fall apart after a few years so that the customer would then have to buy a new one — has now made itself obsolete. It refused to build automobiles that the public wanted, cars that got great gas mileage, were as safe as they could be, and were exceedingly comfortable to drive. Oh — and that wouldn’t start falling apart after two years. GM stubbornly fought environmental and safety regulations. Its executives arrogantly ignored the “inferior” Japanese and German cars, cars which would become the gold standard for automobile buyers. And it was hell-bent on punishing its unionized workforce, lopping off thousands of workers for no good reason other than to “improve” the short-term bottom line of the corporation. Beginning in the 1980s, when GM was posting record profits, it moved countless jobs to Mexico and elsewhere, thus destroying the lives of tens of thousands of hard-working Americans. The glaring stupidity of this policy was that, when they eliminated the income of so many middle class families, who did they think was going to be able to afford to buy their cars? History will record this blunder in the same way it now writes about the French building the Maginot Line or how the Romans cluelessly poisoned their own water system with lethal lead in its pipes. So here we are at the deathbed of General Motors. The company’s body not yet cold, and I find myself filled with — dare I say it — joy. It is not the joy of revenge against a corporation that ruined my hometown and brought misery, divorce, alcoholism, homelessness, physical and mental debilitation, and drug addiction to the people I grew up with. Nor do I, obviously, claim any joy in knowing that 21,000 more GM workers will be told that they, too, are without a job. But you and I and the rest of America now own a car company! I know, I know — who on earth wants to run a car company? Who among us wants $50 billion of our tax dollars thrown down the rat hole of still trying to save GM? Let’s be clear about this: The only way to save GM is to kill GM. Saving our precious industrial infrastructure, though, is another matter and must be a top priority. If we allow the shutting down and tearing down of our auto plants, we will sorely wish we still had them when we realize that those factories could have built the alternative energy systems we now desperately need. And when we realize that the best way to transport ourselves is on light rail and bullet trains and cleaner buses, how will we do this if we’ve allowed our industrial capacity and its skilled workforce to disappear? Thus, as GM is “reorganized” by the federal government and the bankruptcy court, here is the plan I am asking President Obama to implement for the good of the workers, the GM communities, and the nation as a whole. Twenty years ago when I made “Roger & Me,” I tried to warn people about what was ahead for General Motors. Had the power structure and the punditocracy listened, maybe much of this could have been avoided. Based on my track record, I request an honest and sincere consideration of the following suggestions:
Well, that’s a start. Please, please, please don’t save GM so that a smaller version of it will simply do nothing more than build Chevys or Cadillacs. This is not a long-term solution. Don’t throw bad money into a company whose tailpipe is malfunctioning, causing a strange odor to fill the car. 100 years ago this year, the founders of General Motors convinced the world to give up their horses and saddles and buggy whips to try a new form of transportation. Now it is time for us to say goodbye to the internal combustion engine. It seemed to serve us well for so long. We enjoyed the car hops at the A&W. We made out in the front — and the back — seat. We watched movies on large outdoor screens, went to the races at NASCAR tracks across the country, and saw the Pacific Ocean for the first time through the window down Hwy. 1. And now it’s over. It’s a new day and a new century. The President — and the UAW — must seize this moment and create a big batch of lemonade from this very sour and sad lemon. Yesterday, the last surviving person from the Titanic disaster passed away. She escaped certain death that night and went on to live another 97 years. So can we survive our own Titanic in all the Flint Michigans of this country. 60% of GM is ours. I think we can do a better job. Yours, SectionsCommentaryTopicsBullet Trains, Buses, Gas Taxes, General Motors, Green Energy, Layoffs, Light Rail, mass transit, Michael Moore, retooling, Spring Hill, Titanic |
Archives |
||
© 2009 Clarksville, TN Online is owned and operated by residents of Clarksville Tennessee.
| ||||
June 2nd, 2009 at 10:34 am
I strongly disagree with his point 9 as this would be putative to the poor and middle class, while it would not affect the rich at all. 1-8 however sounds like a pretty good idea, overall.
June 2nd, 2009 at 8:19 pm
I disagree as well with point 9 Bill. I also believe environmentalists predicting “global catastrophe” aided in the demise of GM. While it is indesputible that man has an effect on the environment, the real question is how much of an effect. If it would have such a catastrophic effect, we’would have already seen major changes. We know the earth’s climate has changed much more radically without man’s presence in the past, but I think many environmentalists have played the global warming fear card to the point of numbness. People are so scared to buy gas guzzlers and auto makers have such strict emmission standards, its impossible for them to continue to make money they way they had done traditionally. As with every business however, GM must change with the times or fall by the wayside. I do like his high speed and light train concepts, as long as it is done privately as it is in Japan. The last thing the government needs to be doing is spending(borrowing) billions on something else.