<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Clarksville, TN Online &#187; Net Neutrality</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.clarksvilleonline.com/tag/net-neutrality/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.clarksvilleonline.com</link>
	<description>The voice of Clarksville, Tennessee</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:47:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>What’s the Biggest Threat to Free Speech in America?</title>
		<link>http://www.clarksvilleonline.com/2007/10/12/what%e2%80%99s-the-biggest-threat-to-free-speech-in-america/</link>
		<comments>http://www.clarksvilleonline.com/2007/10/12/what%e2%80%99s-the-biggest-threat-to-free-speech-in-america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2007 10:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>A Guest Commentator</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AT&T]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Free Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Savetheinternet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Verizon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clarksvilleonline.com/2007/10/12/what%e2%80%99s-the-biggest-threat-to-free-speech-in-america/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you thought phone companies were simply supposed to get you connected, think again. 





Verizon’s notion of “progress” may not agree with your notion of free speech


Over the last several weeks we learned that the nation’s two largest telecommunications firms want to get into the business of censorship as well — blocking the free flow [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><em><font color="#333399">If you thought phone companies were simply supposed to get you connected, think again. </font></em></strong></p>
<table border="0" align="left" width="180" cellPadding="0" cellSpacing="0" style="background: #ccc; margin: 0px 10px 10px 0px; border: #000 1px solid" id="caption" class="caption">
<tr>
<td align="center" style="padding: 5px"><img src="http://www.clarksvilleonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/verizon.jpg" alt="Version Make Progress Every day" /><a target="_blank" href="http://www.savetheinternet.com/"  ></a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="padding: 5px">Verizon’s notion of “progress” may not agree with your notion of free speech</td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>Over the last several weeks we learned that the nation’s two largest telecommunications firms want to get into the business of censorship as well — blocking the free flow of information over phones and the Internet.</p>
<p>We saw an unsettling example of just how bad this can get last week. Verizon Wireless <a target="_blank" href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/timothy-karr/free-speech-shouldnt-end_b_66367.html" >blocked text messages</a> that national pro-choice group NARAL wanted to send to their members. That they reversed the decision after the censorship was exposed should offer little comfort.</p>
<p>While they may have scrambled to fix one “<a target="_blank" href="http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2007/10/01/woops-telecoms-help-make-case-for-neutral-net"  >dusty policy</a>” and let these messages through, we can see in the details of this and <a target="_blank" href="http://www.savetheinternet.com/blog/2007/08/15/att-gets-caught-in-its-own-spin-cycle/"  >other episodes</a> a worrisome pattern of abuse. And it’s not just at Verizon. Over the weekend, the technophiles at <a target="_blank" href="http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/09/29/104252"  >Slashdot</a> exposed what many of us failed to read in the fine print of our AT&amp;T customer agreements.<span id="more-2430"></span></p>
<h3>Censorship Is in the Details</h3>
<p style="text-align: center"><a href="http://www.cartoonistgroup.com/properties/Wuerker/search.php"  target="_blank" ><img align="middle" width="400" src="http://www.clarksvilleonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/03/netneutrality.jpg" alt="A Net Neutrality cartoon by Matt Wuerker" title="A Net Neutrality cartoon by Matt Wuerker" /></a></p>
<p>Deep in its “<a href="http://home.bellsouth.net/csbellsouth/s/s.dll?spage=cg/legal/att.htm&#038;leg=tos"  target="_blank" >terms of service</a>” for high-speed services AT&amp;T had buried this tidbit: The phone company may “immediately terminate or suspend all or a portion of your service … without notice, for conduct that AT&amp;T believes … tends to damage the name or reputation of AT&amp;T, or its parents, affiliates and subsidiaries.”</p>
<p>We have since sifted the agreements of other access providers and found even more <a href="http://netservices.verizon.net/portal/link/main/policies"  target="_blank" >explicit language</a> over at Verizon: The company “reserves the right and sole discretion to change, limit, terminate, modify at any time, temporarily or permanently cease to provide the Service or any part thereof to any user or group of users, without prior notice and for any reason or no reason.”</p>
<p>You got that?</p>
<h3>You’re Busted!</h3>
<p>These multi-billion dollar network giants are telling their Internet and cell phone customers this: If you want “your world delivered,” you better play nice with the phone companies.</p>
<p>That means no speaking out of turn against AT&amp;T and Verizon’s slow services, high prices or anti-competitive practices.</p>
<table align="center" width="350" style="border: #000 1px solid" id="caption" class="caption">
<tr>
<td><img align="middle" src="http://www.clarksvilleonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2006/10/adamzyglisattmerger.jpg" alt="Adam Zyglis's editorial art on the AT&amp;T merger done for the Buffalo News, used with permission." title="Adam Zyglis's editorial art on the AT&amp;T merger done for the Buffalo News, used with permission." id="image613" /><br />
An Editorial cartoon by Adam Zyglis of the <a href="http://www.buffalonews.com/"  target="_blank"  title="The Buffalo News">Buffalo News.</a> Visit his website at <a href="http://www.adamzyglis.com/"  target="_blank"  title="Adam Zyglis's professional website">http://www.adamzyglis.com/</a></td>
</tr>
</table>
<p>Speak out for <a href="http://www.savetheinternet.com/=faq"  target="_blank" >Net Neutrality</a> and you could find your self on the <a href="http://www.freepress.net/docs/bbrc2-final.pdf"  target="_blank" >wrong side of the digital divide</a>. Losing an Internet connection would hit especially hard those millions of Americans in markets where the phone company is the only Internet service in town.</p>
<p>It gets weirder. Listed among AT&amp;T’s “<a href="http://helpme.att.net/article.php?item=441"  target="_blank" >prohibited activities</a>” are “creating or attempts to utilize a domain or domain name that is defamatory, fraudulent, indecent, offensive, deceptive, threatening, abusive, harassing, or which damages the name or reputation of AT&amp;T.” [my emphasis]</p>
<p>This seems to take AT&amp;T’s content policing one further. It is not enough that you can be disconnected for conduct that damages the reputation of AT&amp;T, but you can lose your feed for simply visiting a Web site — or “domain” — that does the same.</p>
<p>Guess what? You’re doing that right now.</p>
<h3>Free Speech Everywhere</h3>
<p>Perhaps you think we’re making much out of nothing — that such fine print is created by lawyers to cover a company’s but in rare, worst case scenarios.</p>
<p>Try thinking about it this way: If a phone company can’t tell you what to say on a phone call, then it shouldn’t be able to tell you what to say in a text message, an e-mail, a blog or anywhere else. Speech should be free wherever it occurs &#8211; on the Internet, over cell phones, on the streets &#8211; everywhere. And it should be protected.</p>
<p>More and more of our communications occur in digital formats. It’s time Americans safeguarded free speech in this new media with the passion that we protect it in old. A good place to start is with the two companies that control Internet and cell phone access for more than 120 million Americans.</p>
<p>My organization Free Press has called on Congress to <a href="http://www.freepress.net/press/release.php?id=278"  target="_blank" >convene hearings</a> that address phone company censorship policies. You can support this effort by <a href="http://action.freepress.net/campaign/verizon"  target="_blank" >writing your member of Congress</a> and urging them to stand with the rest of us and investigate this abuse.</p>
<p>The biggest threat to free speech in America is public complacency. We must have this discussion about our democratic rights while we still can.</p>
<p>Phone lobbyists exert immense power over both Democrats and Republicans in the halls of Washington. As an alternative to opening their doors wide to AT&amp;T and Verizon lobbyists, the least our elected officials could do for us is keep new communications open for everyone.</p>
<h3>About Free Press</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.freepress.net/"  target="_blank"  title="Free Press"><img border="0" align="left" src="http://www.clarksvilleonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/freepress.jpg" alt="Free Press" />Free Press</a> is a national nonpartisan organization working to increase informed public participation in crucial media policy debates, and to generate policies that will produce a more competitive and public interest-oriented media system with a strong nonprofit and noncommercial sector.</p>
<h3>About Timothy Karr</h3>
<p><img align="right" src="http://www.clarksvilleonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/timkarr1.thumbnail.jpg" alt="Timothy Karr, Campaign Director at Free Press" />Timothy Karr is Campaign Director at Free Press. He manages both the <a href="http://savetheinternet.com/"  target="_blank" >SavetheInternet.com</a> and <a href="http://stopbigmedia.com/"  target="_blank" >StopBigMedia.com</a> Coalition campaigns, in addition to his work on fake news and propaganda, and journalism in crisis. Prior to Free Press, Tim served as executive director of <a href="http://mediachannel.org/"  target="_blank" >MediaChannel.org</a> and vice president of Globalvision New Media and the Globalvision News Network. He has also worked extensively as an editor, reporter and photojournalist for the Associated Press, Time Inc., New York Times and Australia Consolidated Press. <o></o></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clarksvilleonline.com/2007/10/12/what%e2%80%99s-the-biggest-threat-to-free-speech-in-america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Support Net Neutrality</title>
		<link>http://www.clarksvilleonline.com/2007/03/29/support-net-neutrality/</link>
		<comments>http://www.clarksvilleonline.com/2007/03/29/support-net-neutrality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 00:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bill Larson</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bellsouth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CDE Lightband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Charter Communications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fiber to the home]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Net Neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Network Neutrality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Save the internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Sites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.clarksvilleonline.com/2007/03/29/support-net-neutrality/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Net neutrality is the principle that on the Internet everyone is equal. That a personal website or a small businesses web site is on equal footing with the largest multinational corporations. It was the founding principle of the Internet. Large corporate interests now want to change that.
They already control your Internet connection and now want to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.savetheinternet.com/"  ><img border="0" align="left" width="150" src="http://www.savetheinternet.com/images/blog_image.jpg" alt="Save the Internet: Click here" height="200" /></a>Net neutrality is the principle that on the Internet everyone is equal. That a personal website or a small businesses web site is on equal footing with the largest multinational corporations. It was the founding principle of the Internet. Large corporate interests now want to change that.</p>
<p>They already control your Internet connection and now want to use that gatekeeper status to be able generate more income for themselves by charging content providers for faster access to your Internet connection. If you speed up some, it goes without saying that you must slow down others. Net Neutrality is important to ensure that small independent sites like Clarksville Online can continue to compete and provide an important alternative voice to corporate media.</p>
<p>Clarksville, TN will not be at the mercy of these corporations with alternatives available like CDE&#8217;s Fiber to the Home service which is coming soon.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pbs.org/"  target="_blank"  title="Public Broadcasting System">PBS</a>&#8217;s program <a href="http://www.pbs.org/now/"  target="_blank"  title="PBS's Now">NOW</a> did a show on this important subject. Lets take a look.<span id="more-1040"></span></p>
<p align="center"><p><a href="http://www.clarksvilleonline.com/2007/03/29/support-net-neutrality/"  ><em>Click here to view the embedded video.</em></a></p></p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.savetheinternet.org/"  target="_blank"  title="The Save the Internet Campaign">Save the Internet</a> Campaign compiled a frequently asked questions (F.A.Q) to help explain why Net Neutrality is important, why you should care, and steps you can take. Check it out:</p>
<h3>What is this about?</h3>
<p>This is about Internet freedom. &#8220;Network Neutrality&#8221; &#8212; the First Amendment of the Internet &#8212; ensures that the public can view the smallest blog just as easily as the largest corporate Web site by preventing Internet companies like AT&amp;T from rigging the playing field for only the highest-paying sites.</p>
<p>But Internet providers like AT&amp;T, Verizon and Comcast are spending millions of dollars lobbying Congress to gut Net Neutrality. If Congress doesn&#8217;t take action now to implement meaningful Net Neutrality provisions, the future of the Internet is at risk.</p>
<p>To learn more, read <a href="http://www.freepress.net/docs/nn_fact_v_fiction_final.pdf"  target="_blank"  title="Free Press's Network Neutrality Fact vs fiction">Network Neutrality: Fact vs. Fiction</a></p>
<h3>What is Network Neutrality?</h3>
<p>Network Neutrality or &#8220;Net Neutrality&#8221; for short, is the guiding principle that preserves the free and open Internet.</p>
<p>Net Neutrality ensures that all users can access the content or run the applications and devices of their choice. With Net Neutrality, the network&#8217;s only job is to move data, and not to choose which data to privilege with higher quality service. Net Neutrality prevents the companies that control the wires from discriminating against content based on its source or ownership.</p>
<p>Net Neutrality is the reason why the Internet has driven economic innovation, democratic participation, and free speech online. It&#8217;s why the Internet has become an unrivaled environment for open communications, civic involvement and free speech.</p>
<p>Learn more in <a href="http://www.savetheinternet.com/=101"  target="_blank"  title="Net Neutrality 101">Net Neutrality 101</a>.</p>
<h3>Who wants to get rid of Net Neutrality?</h3>
<p>The nation&#8217;s largest telephone and cable companies — including AT&amp;T, Verizon, Comcast and Time Warner — want to be Internet gatekeepers, deciding which Web sites go fast or slow and which won&#8217;t load at all.</p>
<p>They want to tax content providers to guarantee speedy delivery of their data. They want to discriminate in favor of their own search engines, Internet phone services, and streaming video — while slowing down or blocking their competitors.</p>
<p>These companies have a new vision for the Internet. Instead of an even playing field, they want to reserve express lanes for their own content and services — or those from big corporations that can afford the steep tolls — and leave the rest of us on a winding dirt road.</p>
<h3>What&#8217;s at stake?</h3>
<p>Decisions being made now will shape the future of the Internet for a generation. Before long, all media — TV, phone and the Web — will come to your home via the same broadband connection. The dispute over Net Neutrality is about who&#8217;ll control access to new and emerging technologies.</p>
<p>On the Internet, consumers are in ultimate control — deciding between content, applications and services available anywhere, no matter who owns the network. There&#8217;s no middleman. But without Net Neutrality, the Internet will look more like cable TV. Network owners will decide which channels, content and applications are available; consumers will have to choose from their menu.</p>
<p>The Internet has always been driven by innovation. Web sites and services succeeded or failed on their own merit. Without Net Neutrality, decisions now made collectively by millions of users will be made in corporate boardrooms. The choice we face now is whether we can choose the content and services we want, or whether the broadband barons will choose for us.</p>
<h3>What&#8217;s happening in Congress?</h3>
<p>Congress is now considering a major overhaul of the Telecommunications Act. The telephone and cable companies are filling up congressional campaign coffers and hiring high-priced lobbyists. They&#8217;ve set up &#8220;Astroturf&#8221; groups like &#8220;Hands Off the Internet&#8221; to confuse the issue and give the appearance of grassroots support.</p>
<p>On June 8, the House of Representatives passed the &#8220;Communications Opportunity, Promotion and Enhancement Act of 2006,&#8221; or COPE Act (H.R. 5252) &#8212; a bill that offers no meaningful protections for Net Neutrality. An amendment offered by Rep. Ed Markey (D-Mass.), which would have instituted real Net Neutrality requirements, was defeated by intense industry lobbying.</p>
<p>It now falls to the Senate to save the free and open Internet. Fortunately, Sens. Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) and Byron Dorgan (D-N.D.) have introduced a bipartisan measure, the &#8220;Internet Freedom Preservation Act of 2006&#8243; (S. 2917), that would provide meaningful protection for Net Neutrality.</p>
<p>On June 28, the Snowe-Dorgan bill was introduced as an amendment to Sen. Ted Stevens&#8217; (R-Alaska) major rewrite of the Telecom Act (S.2686) [now HR.5252]. The committee split down the middle on the measure, casting a tie vote of 11-11.</p>
<p>Though meaningful Net Neutrality protections were not added to Stevens&#8217; bill, the fight for Internet freedom is gaining serious momentum as the bill moves toward the full Senate later this year. Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) has threatened to place a &#8220;hold&#8221; on the entire legislation unless it reinstates Net Neutrality and prevents discrimination on the Internet.</p>
<p>Heading into August recess, the Senate Commerce Committee reclassified the Stevens bill as the <a href="http://commerce.senate.gov/public/_files/HR5252RS.pdf"  target="_blank"  title="Advanced Telecommunications and opportunities reform act">&#8220;Advanced Telecommunications and Opportunities Reform Act&#8221;</a> (HR.5252) to speed it to conference committee should it pass.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.savetheinternet.com/=callin"  target="_blank"  title="Call Congress">Call Congress</a> today: No senator can in good conscience vote against Internet freedom and with the telecom cartel.</p>
<h3>Isn&#8217;t this just a battle between giant corporations?</h3>
<p>No. Small business owners benefit from an Internet that allows them to compete directly — not one where they can&#8217;t afford the price of entry. Net Neutrality ensures that innovators can start small and dream big about being the next EBay or Google without facing insurmountable hurdles. Without Net Neutrality, startups and entrepreneurs will be muscled out of the marketplace by big corporations that pay for a top spot on the Web.</p>
<p>But Net Neutrality doesn&#8217;t just matter to business owners. If Congress turns the Internet over to the telephone and cable giants, everyone who uses the Internet will be affected. Connecting to your office could take longer if you don&#8217;t purchase your carrier&#8217;s preferred applications. Sending family photos and videos could slow to a crawl. Web pages you always use for online banking, access to health care information, planning a trip, or communicating with friends and family could fall victim to pay-for-speed schemes.</p>
<p>Independent voices and political groups are especially vulnerable. Costs will skyrocket to post and share video and audio clips, silencing bloggers and amplifying the big media companies. Political organizing could be slowed by the handful of dominant Internet providers who ask advocacy groups or candidates to pay a fee to join the &#8220;fast lane.&#8221;</p>
<h3>Isn&#8217;t the threat to Net Neutrality just hypothetical?</h3>
<p>No. By far the most significant evidence regarding the network owners&#8217; plans to discriminate is their <a href="http://www.savetheinternet.com/=threat#abuse"  target="_blank"  title="Network provider's intent to discriminate">stated intent to do so</a>.</p>
<p>The CEOs of all the largest telecom companies have made clear their intent to build a tiered Internet with faster service for the select few companies willing or able to pay the exorbitant tolls.Network Neutrality advocates are not imagining a doomsday scenario. We are taking the telecom execs at their word.</p>
<p>So far, we&#8217;ve only seen the tip of the iceberg. But numerous examples show that without network neutrality requirements, Internet service providers will discriminate against content and competing services they don&#8217;t like.</p>
<ul>
<li>In 2004, North Carolina ISP Madison River blocked their DSL customers from using any rival Web-based phone service.</li>
<li>In 2005, Canada&#8217;s telephone giant Telus blocked customers from visiting a Web site sympathetic to the Telecommunications Workers Union during a labor dispute.</li>
<li>Shaw, a big Canadian cable TV company, is charging an extra $10 a month to subscribers in order to &#8220;enhance&#8221; competing Internet telephone services.</li>
<li>In April, Time Warner&#8217;s AOL blocked all emails that mentioned <a target="_blank" href="http://www.dearaol.com"  >www.dearaol.com</a> — an advocacy campaign opposing the company&#8217;s pay-to-send e-mail scheme.</li>
</ul>
<p>This type of censorship will become the norm unless we act now. Given the chance, these gatekeepers will consistently put their own interests before the public good.</p>
<h3>Won&#8217;t more regulations harm the free Internet? Shouldn&#8217;t we just let the market decide?</h3>
<p>Writing Net Neutrality into law would preserve the freedoms we currently enjoy on the Internet. For all their talk about &#8220;deregulation,&#8221; the cable and telephone giants don&#8217;t want real competition. They want special rules written in their favor.</p>
<p>Either we make rules that ensure an even playing field for everyone, or we have rules that hold the Internet captive to the whims of a few big companies. The Internet has thrived because revolutionary ideas like blogs, Wikipedia or Google could start on a shoestring and attract huge audiences. Without Net Neutrality, the pipeline owners will choose the winners and losers on the Web.</p>
<p>The cable and telephone companies already dominate 98 percent of the broadband access market. And when the network owners start abusing their control of the pipes, there will be nowhere else for consumers to turn.</p>
<h3>Who&#8217;s part of the SavetheInternet.com Coalition?</h3>
<p>The SavetheInternet.com coalition is made up of hundreds of groups from across the political spectrum that are concerned about maintaining a free and open Internet. No corporation or political party is funding our efforts. We simply agree to a <a href="http://www.savetheinternet.com/=principles"  target="_blank"  title="Save the intenret's statement of principle">statement of principles</a> in support of Internet freedom.</p>
<p>The coalition is being coordinated by Free Press, a national, nonpartisan organization focused on media reform and Internet policy issues. Please <a href="http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.asp?u=675152044966"  target="_blank"  title="Save the internet survey">complete this brief survey</a> if your group would like to join this broad, bipartisan effort to save the Internet.</p>
<h3>Who else supports Net Neutrality?</h3>
<p>The supporters of Net Neutrality include leading high-tech companies such as Amazon.com, Earthlink, EBay, Google, Intel, Microsoft, Skype, Vonage and Yahoo. Prominent national figures such as Internet pioneer Vint Cerf, Stanford law professor Lawrence Lessig and FCC Commissioner Michael Copps have called for stronger Net Neutrality protections.</p>
<p>Editorial boards at the New York Times, Los Angeles Times, San Francisco Chronicle, San Jose Mercury News, Seattle Times, St. Petersburg Times and Christian Science Monitor all have urged congress to save the Internet.</p>
<h3>What can I do to help?</h3>
<p>Sign the <a target="_blank" href="http://action.freepress.net/campaign/savethenet"  >SavetheInternet.com petition</a>.</p>
<p>Call <a target="_blank" href="http://www.savetheinternet.com/=callin"  >your members of Congress</a> today and demand that Net Neutrality be protected.</p>
<p>Encourage groups you&#8217;re part of to <a target="_blank" href="http://action.freepress.net/campaign/joinsti"  >sign the &#8220;Internet Freedom Declaration of 2007&#8243;</a>.</p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.savetheinternet.com/=swag"  >Show your support for Internet freedom</a> on your Web site or blog.</p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://action.freepress.net/campaign/savethenet/forward"  >Tell your friends</a> about this crucial issue before it&#8217;s too late.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><a target="_blank" href="http://www.cartoonistgroup.com/properties/Wuerker/search.php"   title="A Net Neutrality cartoon by Matt Wuerker"><img align="middle" width="400" src="http://www.clarksvilleonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/03/netneutrality.jpg" alt="A Net Neutrality cartoon by Matt Wuerker" style="width: 400px" title="A Net Neutrality cartoon by Matt Wuerker" /></a></p>
<p>* <font size="-2">Save the internet&#8217;s network neutrality FAQ included without permission. Cartoon by <a target="_blank" href="http://www.cartoonistgroup.com/properties/Wuerker/search.php"  >Matt Wuerker</a>  originally created for <a target="_blank" href="http://www.itsournet.org/"  >http://www.itsournet.org/</a>  used here with minor modifications.</font></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.clarksvilleonline.com/2007/03/29/support-net-neutrality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
