66 F
Clarksville
Tuesday, April 16, 2024
HomeCommentaryLet’s Just See Who Is Entitled

Let’s Just See Who Is Entitled

The word “entitlement” means, in the legal sense, “a guarantee of access to benefits because of rights or by agreement through law.” The Social Security Act was signed into law under President Franklin Delano Roosevelt in 1935. Originally established as a safeguard after the Great Depression, Social Security is currently estimated to keep roughly 40% of all Americans age 65 or older out of poverty.

One of the provisions is social insurance program that is funded through dedicated payroll taxes called Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA).

After some changes in the original law, Social Security now covers benefits for retirement, disability, survivorship, and death, which are the four main benefits provided by traditional private-sector pension plans.

It needs to be said over and over again that these Americans have paid into Social Security throughout their working lives in order not to end up in total poverty in their old age.

Somehow we older folks have now begun to hear that our “entitlement” is one of the main problems in the economic downturn that our country now faces. We are accused of taking huge amounts of money from the federal budget as though we had never put it there to start with.

We are a large portion of the population and as we grow older need to get our retirement funds, but we are not responsible for Congress’s robbing the Social Security funds to pay for other budgetary deficits. Our contributions have ENTITLED us to get our retirement so that we can now live a decent life after devoting ourselves to building this country to a prime level of productivity.

Yes, there could be some fine tuning in the Social Security system.

I used to work for two people who were multimillionaires, both of whom had a master’s degree in economics. They received a Social Security check each month. Both flatly stated that people who were more than capable of living without these government checks should not be receiving them!

It would not injure the Social Security system to cut off Social Security checks to people with more than two million dollars worth of assets. These people don’t need the few hundred dollars they receive each month and this money could be spent better elsewhere.

That doesn’t mean that other people who have Social Security as their prime retirement funds don’t need their check each month.

A number of our politicians seem to be living in some kind of Never Never Land where they believe they can do anything they feel like and never feel repercussions. Some actually believe that kicking firefighters, police officers and teachers is the way to heal their state or federal government problems.

News bulletin: the next time these people have a child or grandchild who needs educating, let them call a politician for help.

The next time their house is on fire, let them call another politician and see how soon this citizen puts out the fire.

The next time their house is being shot at or their daughter is being raped, call a fellow politician and see what kind of defense this genius comes up with.

And all these people who have decided that Social Security is the culprit, call on a retiree to vote for you in the next election. My bet is that you’re going to be just plain out of luck.

We may be old but we still remember who causes each of us to worry if we can pay the electric bill this month, or whether we can afford our medicine, or if we’re going to be able to eat every day.

You might be using your brain for a hat rack, but we aren’t!

In fact, we think it’s time we put you politicians on minimum wage for a few years and see how you like it. Let’s let you do without health insurance or Medicare when you get old and see how your body holds up.

Of course, you know there’s no inflation this year as of the time Social Security recipients needed a raise this year. It’s just a coincidence that gas prices are nearly doubling, that food prices have shot up, and that clothing is going to cost more. Also, good old TVA is planning an increase…..and the beat goes on!

Oh, yes, dear politicians, you’ve listened to the screamers on the Capitol steps that wear funny stuff on their hats. You think everyone believes that you can cut anything you want to as long as it hurts poor people.

Guess what? There are more of us than there are of you. If you don’t believe me, just wait until the next election.

By then, you may have damaged the public schools so that you can find a little extra cash that will lead to more charter schools. By then, you may have taken away benefits from public servants who keep this country safe and learning. By then, you may have damaged our democracy beyond what is now even imaginable.

But we won’t forget—not you, not your callous disregard for other people. Payback is coming your way!

Sue Freeman Culverhouse
Sue Freeman Culverhousehttp://culverhouseart.com/
Author of Tennessee Literary Luminaries: From Cormac McCarthy to Robert Penn Warren (The History Press, 2013) Sue Freeman Culverhouse has been a freelance writer for the past 36 years. Beginning in 1976, she published magazines articles in Americana, Historic Preservation, American Horticulturist, Flower and Garden, The Albemarle Magazine, and many others. Sue is the winner of two Virginia Press Awards in writing. She moved to Springfield, Tennessee in 2003 with her sculptor husband, Bill a retired attorney. Sue has one daughter,  Susan Leigh Miller who teaches poetry and creative writing at Rutgers University. Sue teaches music and writing at Watauga Elementary School in Ridgetop, Tennessee to approximately 500 students in kindergarten through fifth grade. She also publishes a literary magazine each year; all work in the magazine is written and illustrated by the students. Sue writes "Uncommon Sense," a column in the Robertson County Times, which also appears on Clarksville Online. She is the author of "Seven keys to a sucessful life", which is  available on amazon.com and pubishamerica.com; this is a self-help book for all ages.
RELATED ARTICLES

3 COMMENTS

  1. As a member of the custodial generation whose Social Security benefit finds its way to my bank account every month, I pencil in the “I’m entitled” box. However I’m conflicted, when I put on my grandparent hat, something on the left side of my brain keeps asking, if you’re entitled, who’s obligated?. That one thought serves to inform me, more than one party has a stake in this conversation, and that’s why future dialogue regarding Social Security must reside in the intra-generational conference room. In other words, meaningful dialogue between those who get, and those who pay, based on a credible factual foundation. We can’t begin with I’m entitled based on a false political equation of 2 + 2 equals 5. Beginning there will put the dialogue In a tailspin and we’ll end up chasing our own tails again.

    No doubt Social Security has been a force for good, however post 1983 Social Security has morphed into a cancer on middle class working Americans. Evidence can be found littered across any main street in America; lost jobs, home foreclosures, bankruptcies, and financial institutions unable to fund business growth and new job creation. Any treatment plan addressing a life threatening issue must begin with a full, and factual diagnosis, a pathology report if you will: http://sobreport.com/?p=66 Once diagnosed, a comprehensive, community based treatment plan can be implemented. One that allows middle class working Americans, their families, and the communities they call home to prosper again: http://sobreport.com/?p=70 In today’s world, it’s impossible to say “I’m entitled”, without acknowledging whose obligated. As a grandparent I’ve concluded my obligation to the next generation, and the entitlements of this generation can both be addressed, but only if we are willing to open a factual dialogue. My generation has an obligation to leave the next generation what they’re entitled to, and that’s not new obligations. It’s handing off the generational chain of trust intact, and until we set a plan in motion to accomplish that, we’re not entitled to what we’re entitled to. The Government Can – Daily Radio Show – 9am Eastern http://www.blogtalkradio.com/pappyg

  2. I think because the government has no interest in risking it so that they get a bigger bonus. They also have less of an overhead. Look at Medicare vs private insurance. In reality contrary to the propaganda what the government does it generally does pretty well.

    You can’t say the same for Wall Street, big banks, or private for profit corporations.

Latest Articles